Background
A private letter ruling (PLR) is a letter that is issued by the IRS to a taxpayer in response to the taxpayer’s request for clarification of the law as it applies to a specific situation. Managers of PTPs and prospective PTPs often seek PLRs to be sure that their activities will be considered qualifying income under I.R.C. §7704. While a PLR is applicable only to the taxpayer requesting it (whose identity is not released) and cannot be used as precedent, it can be an indication of the IRS’ thinking.
Below are the PLRs related to qualifying income arranged by release date. The issue date is the date the ruling was issued to the taxpayer. The release date is the date the ruling was released to the public. Click on the PLR number to see the full text. CLick here for a summary of PLRs going back to 1999.
2018
PLR201833008, issued May 22, 2018; released August 17, 2018. Production and marketing of fertilizer.
Income derived from the production and marketing of ammonia, urea (both granulated and in solution), and UAN to both agricultural and non-agricultural customers is qualifying income for purposes of § 7704(d)(1)(E). This ruling only applies to the extent that the products in question are of a grade that is consistent with industry standards for agricultural uses as a fertilizer and such products in the form sold are commonly sold and used as fertilizer. In addition, this ruling does not apply to retail sales made directly to end users.
2017
PLR 201751006, issued September 22, 2018; released December 22, 2018. Oilfield services.
PLR 201751006 addresses issues related to income from providing various oilfield services to oil and natural gas producers. The taxpayer is a limited liability company which intends to form a publicly traded partnership (PTP) by creating a new limited partnership and effecting an
initial public offering of units in the partnership PTP. The PTP will provide essential fluid, solids, and other oilfield waste handling, treatment, and disposal services to oil and natural gas producers engaged in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas (the Producers). In particular, the PTP will generate income from: (A) the supply and transportation of fluids, such as freshwater and brine, for use in fracturing and drilling operations (Fluid Delivery Services); (B) the treatment and disposal of waste streams, including the transportation to disposal, processing, and/or treatment facilities (Oilfield Waste Treatment and Disposal Services); and (C) services to remove oilfield waste material from equipment (Equipment Washout Services). The PTP will also earn income from the sale of hydrocarbons recovered from oilfield waste to third party collection companies. The PTP will provide the services through affiliated entities sing employees of the PTP or of affiliated entities working under the supervision, direction, and control of the Partnership.
The IRS ruled that that gross income derived by the PTP from its Fluid Delivery Services, Oilfield Waste Treatment and Disposal Services, and Equipment Washout Services will constitute qualifying income within the meaning of § 7704(d)(1)(E). It further ruled that gross income derived by the PTP from the recovery and marketing of hydrocarbons and the mining and marketing of brine produced from solution mining other than to end users at the retail level constitutes qualifying income within the meaning of § 7704(d)(1)(E). The IRS noted that the ruling is not applicable to any income derived by PTP from the delivery and transfer of fluid, including recycled produced water, brine (but not including brine produced from solution mining), and drilling mud, where the PTP does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of produced water and drilling production waste after use within the same geographic area.
PLR 201741001 addresses the status of income from the production, storage, transportation, and marketing of a nitrogen-based fertilizer to both agricultural and non-agricultural customers, as well as income from certain rent payments and other fees arising under a ground lease, including rent payments based on a percentage of the lessee’s sales. Specifically, the PLR addresses the status of income to a wholly-owned subsidiary of a parent entity. Interests in the subsidiary may be sold to the public in an initial public offering. The subsidiary will be engaged in the production and marketing of a nitrogen-based fertilizer and will sell that fertilizer in bulk to customers operating in agricultural and non-agricultural industries. The parent represents that all of the nitrogen-based fertilizer to be produced by the subsidiary is marketable as fertilizer for agricultural purposes.
The parent also owns a campus and has entered into a ground lease with a lessee with respect to a portion of the campus. The lessee owns and operates a processing plant on the portion of the campus that it leases from the parent. In addition to the land, the campus has utilities infrastructure for providing electricity, water, and sewage services to the lessee. The parent intends to transfer to the subsidiary the assets currently owned by the parent, including the property leased to lessee, and to assign the lease to the subsidiary. Under the lease, in consideration for the use of, or the right to use, a portion of the campus, the lessee will pay rent equal to the sum of a flat rent amount and two separately calculated percentage rent amounts. The flat rent amount is a fixed dollar amount. The first percentage rent amount will be equal to a set percentage of the lessee’s sales of one type of feedstock to the subsidiary. The second percentage rent amount will be equal to a percentage of the lessee’s sales of another type of feedstock to the subsidiary. However, in this case, the percentage will be determined based on a formula, under which the percentage will be equal to the difference between an agreed upon market price of the second feedstock and the current price of that second feedstock divided by the market price of the second feedstock. In addition to the flat rent and the percentage rents, the lessee will also pay to the subsidiary a utilities overhead fee and a pollution control fee, which are related to certain electricity, water, and sewage services.
The IRS ruled that the income to be derived by the subsidiary from the production, storage, transportation, and marketing of the nitrogen-based fertilizer to both agricultural and non-agricultural customers is qualifying income for the purposes of section 7704(d)(1)(E). The ruling is only applicable, however, to the extent that the fertilizer products in question are of a grade that is consistent with industry standards for agricultural uses of fertilizer and such products, in the form in which they are sold, are commonly sold and used as fertilizers. Additionally, the ruling does not apply to any retail sales made directly to end users.
The IRS also ruled that the flat rent and percentage rents both constitute rents from real property and that certain portions of the income from the fees as payment for the electricity, water, and sewage services performed under the lease in connection with the rental of real property constitute rents from real property as charges for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real property under section 856(d)(1)(B), without regard to whether such amounts are excluded as impermissible tenant service income under section 856(d)(2)(C). Therefore, the IRS further ruled that the fees constitute qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(C) as “real property rents” within the meaning of that section.
PLR 201736020 addresses the status of income derived by a partnership from the transportation of crude oil via pipeline, as well as income from certain construction and reimbursement payments associated with the equipment utilized to transport the crude oil. Specifically, the partnership is a publicly traded partnership that owns, operates, develops and acquires pipelines and other midstream assets. Among those assets is an interest in an entity that owns a pipeline. Although certain portions of the PLR (which may include facts relevant to the section 7704(d)(1)(E) analysis) have been redacted in the public version of the PLR, a summary of the activities is included below.
Pursuant to three separate agreements, the entity transports the crude oil production of certain producers from the producers’ oil and gas leases to certain designated delivery points. The oil is first transported by the entity on its lateral pipeline that runs from one of the producers’ facilities to a tie-in to a pipeline located at a second facility of the producers. The oil is then transported on the pipeline. The entity is responsible for operating both the lateral and the pipeline through its contracted operator. The entity also leases space from the producers at the second facility for a pump station and other pipeline assets.
The agreements provide for a transportation fee based on the barrels of oil transported, however, transportation on the lateral is charged a separate fee from that charged for transportation on the pipeline. The entity has the right in certain cases to impose a repair surcharge to cover repairs on the lateral and the pipeline. Persons other than the producers may be the shippers of record if they purchase the crude oil from the producers prior to its transportation on the lateral and the pipeline. In such cases, those shippers are responsible for the transportation fee provided for in the agreements.
If one of the agreements had been terminated prior to first oil because the producers elected to not complete construction of one of their facilities, the producers would have been liable to the entity for certain costs expended with respect to the construction of the lateral, plus a service charge. The producers are also responsible for reimbursing the entity for costs associated with certain direct and indirect costs associated with design, engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and abandonment of certain equipment located at or in the vicinity of one of the producers’ facility. These costs are reimbursed on a cost plus basis.
The IRS ruled that the gross income derived by the partnership from the agreements (as that income is described in the PLR) is qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201732006, issued May 16, 2017; released August 11, 2017. Fluids handling.
PLR 201732006 is another in a series of PLRs regarding the provision of fluid handling services by MLPs to oil and natural gas producers. In this case, a partnership, which intends to be a publicly traded partnership, will provide a broad range of services to producers engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas. These services will include the delivery, handling, treatment, recycling and disposal of petroleum-water mix produced as part of the oil and gas production process (Petroleum-Water Mix Services), and the transportation and storage of fluids used in drilling and completing wells (Fresh Water Distribution Services). The partnership will provide these services through affiliated entities using either employees of the partnership or other contracted third parties.
As part of the Petroleum-Water Mix Services, the partnership will collect and transport the petroleum-water mix to the partnership’s central processing facility for processing and storage before the petroleum-water mix is either delivered to third parties for further treatment and recycling before its reuse in drilling operations or disposed of in underground formations. In some areas, the partnership may collect and transport the petroleum-water mix directly to a salt water disposal well via truck or pipeline. In other areas, the partnership may instead collect and transport the petroleum-water mix to mobile on-site recycling skids via temporary pipelines for processing to meet specific water quality specifications. The partnership will dispose of collected solids at a solid waste facility. Treated water will be returned to producer-owned tanks at the production site for reuse. The partnership will receive a variable service fee for its Petroleum-Water Mix Services based on the volume of the petroleum-water mix received.
As part of the Fresh Water Distribution Services, the partnership will provide fresh water to producers in the same geographic area as its Petroleum-Water Mix Services. The partnership will receive a monthly fee for each month that it provides the Fresh Water Distribution Services.
Consistent with recent PLRs regarding fluid handling, the partnership has made representations that the services require equipment that is dedicated exclusively to use in oil and gas exploration and production, that the partnership’s personnel have specialized knowledge, training and experience, that the services will be provided on an ongoing basis, that the fracturing operations would not be commercially viable without the services and that the services are provided exclusively to those engaged in qualifying activities.
The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from its Petroleum-Water Mix Services and Fresh Water Distribution Services will constitute qualifying income within the meaning of § 7704(d)(1)(E). The ruling does not apply to any income derived from the delivery and transfer of fluids, including recycled produced water, where the partnership does not also collect and clean, recycle or otherwise dispose of produced water and drilling production waste after use within the same geographic area.
PLR 201728021, issued April 17, 2017; released July 14, 2017. Natural gas processing.
PLR 201728021 addresses the status of income derived by an existing MLP from its ownership of a natural gas processing plant that receives fees for its natural gas processing services. Specifically, a publicly traded partnership entered into two agreements related to its indirectly wholly owned natural gas processing plant (the “Plant”). The Plant uses cryogenic expansion to extract NGLs from natural gas.
Under the first arm’s length agreement, the Plant is operated and maintained by an operator (the “Operator”) on behalf of the partnership. The Operator is a minority partner in the partnership and is the indirect 100 percent owner of a natural gas supplier (the “Supplier”). Under the second arm’s length agreement (the “Agreement”), the Plant receives raw natural gas from the Supplier and processes it to remove the NGLs to meet interstate pipeline gas quality specifications. The Supplier retains legal title to the natural gas delivered to the Plant at all times and to the volumes of extracted residue gas and NGLs at the outlet of the facilities. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Supplier subscribes 100 percent of the available natural gas processing capacity of the Plant. The Supplier pays the partnership a processing fee that is composed of both a fixed monthly demand charge (calculated based on the Plant’s capacity to process the natural gas) and a variable service fee (calculated based on the volume of natural gas that the Plant processes).
The IRS ruled that the income derived by the partnership from the processing of natural gas under the Agreement is qualifying income within the meaning of § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201724024, issued March 9, 2017; released June 16, 2017. Construction of interconnects.
PLR 201724024 addresses the status of income derived from the construction and expansion of oil and natural gas transportation systems and processing facilities, as well as income from the receipt of management fees and reimbursement payments for the operation of such assets owned by third parties or through joint ventures. Specifically, the PLR addresses the status of income to an existing MLP from the construction of interconnect points with its transportation and gathering systems, and the development of new or modification of existing transportation and processing facilities. The payments received by the partnership under such arrangements compensate the partnership for the design, materials, construction or assembly of the assets, as well as the inspection and oversight of work performed by third parties. Although the partnership is generally responsible for constructing these assets, the partnership typically engages a third party to perform the construction work. While the partnership may be compensated on a fixed cost basis, reimbursement basis or cost plus basis, the partnership may also recoup the cost of construction through minimum volume commitments from customers.
The partnership also earns income from the receipt of management fees and reimbursement income for operating transportation or processing assets owned by third parties or through joint ventures to which the partnership is a party. In these situations, the partnership performs all of the activities necessary for the functioning of the assets, including the employment of personnel who physically control the assets and perform maintenance.
The IRS ruled that gross income derived by the partnership from the construction of interconnect points with its transportation systems and from expanding transportation assets and processing facilities for natural gas, NGLs and crude oil for use in the partnership’s performance of qualifying activities constitutes qualifying income under I.R.C. § 7704(d)(1)(E). The IRS also ruled that the income derived by the partnership from the receipt of management fees and reimbursement income for operating transportation or processing assets owned by third parties, or through joint ventures to which the partnership is a party constitutes qualifying income.
PLR 201723004, issued January 25, 2017, released June 9, 2017. Fluid handling services.
PLR 201723004 is another in a series of PLRs dealing with MLPs regarding fluid handling services to oil and natural gas producers. However, it is the first such PLR released following the issuance of the final regulations under I.R.C. § 7704. In this case, the PLR addresses the status of income to an existing MLP from fluid management, inter-well transfer, disposal, and hydrocarbon remediation services. As part of its fluid management services, the partnership will supply and transport drilling and fracturing fluids, including fresh water, brine, and other injectants, for use in drilling and hydraulic fracturing to producers via temporary and permanent pipelines, but may also utilize third-party trucking services. With respect to its freshwater services, the partnership will remove freshwater from its sources and transfer the water to above-ground storage tanks or to storage ponds, which will be monitored by the partnership. The partnership will also provide certain inter-well site transportation via pipelines.
In connection with its disposal services, the partnership will treat and dispose of flowback, produced water, and other drilling production wastes, generally by using dedicated pipelines or trucks to transport flowback and produced water to the partnership’s salt water disposal wells. The partnership may treat recycled fluids so that such fluids can be used in future drilling and fracturing operations. The partnership will also provide hydrocarbon remediation services. As a part of these remediation services, the partnership will remove hydrocarbons from the drilling waste at its facilities during the waste treatment and disposal process and sell such reclaimed hydrocarbons.
Consistent with recent PLRs regarding fluid handling, the taxpayer has made representations regarding specialized personnel, that the services are essential to the completion of oil and natural gas drilling and fracturing operations, that the processing, treatment, and disposal of flowback and produced water is required by government regulations and industry standards, that the services will require daily involvement and will be performed on an ongoing basis, and that the partnership’s disposal facilities will be staffed and equipped to allow for remote monitoring.
The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from its fluid management, inter-well transfer, and disposal services will be qualifying income under I.R.C. § 7704(d)(1)(E), as will its income from hydrocarbon remediation services performed as part of the disposal process, so long as the partnership does not sell recovered hydrocarbons to end users at the retail level. The ruling does not apply to any income from the delivery and transfer of water, brine, or other injectants, including recycled produced water, where the partnership does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of produced water and drilling production waste after use.
This PLR addresses the status of income from the processing, transportation, storage, and marketing of wood pellets and wood chips. Specifically, a corporation intends to form a publicly traded partnership to conduct some or all of the corporation’s current wood pellet and wood chipping business. Currently, the corporation acquires timber feedstock, including raw logs, mill chips, roundwood chips, bole chips, and sawdust, which it dries, screens, and reduces in size. The corporation then combines the dried particles with kiln-dried residue and sends the resulting feedstock through a pellet mill. The pellet mill forces the feedstock through holes under pressure, which raises the temperature of the feedstock to bind the particles without the addition of binding agents. Then, the corporation cuts the pellets to size, stores them in silos, and loads them for bulk sales or sales to third-party retailers.
Additionally, the corporation operates timber processing mills, in which it (1) debarks and chips logs; (2) screens the resulting chips for size and re-chips if necessary; (3) stacks the chips for storage, loads them onto trucks or train cars for immediate delivery, or directly conveys the chips to a customer’s facility; (4) separates and sends bark for separate processing; and (5) screens bark and distributes it to the customer. At some mills, the corporation provides only operating services. At other mills, the corporation finances, constructs, maintains, and operates the mill. The corporation generally charges a per-ton fee for its processing services, but may also charge a per-hour fee and a per-month supervisory fee. Additionally, the corporation may charge a fee for reimbursement of its construction costs plus a reasonable rate of return.
On these facts, the IRS ruled that the partnership’s income derived from the processing, transportation, storage, and marketing of wood pellets and wood chips will constitute qualifying income under I.R.C. § 7704(d)(1). Additionally, the ruling specifies that it does not apply to retail sales made directly to end users.
PLR 201721007, issued February 23, 2017; released May 26, 2017. Termination Income.
This PLR addresses the status of payments received in exchange for early termination of certain processing, refining, and transportation agreements. Specifically, a publicly traded partnership entered into agreements (the “Agreements”) with a single customer to process crude oil condensate and provide pipeline transportation services between the partnership’s terminal and the customer’s terminal. Under the Agreements, the partnership agreed to construct certain assets (the “Assets”), including a splitter, storage capacity, and pipelines, which the partnership will own, operate, and maintain after they are placed in service. The partnership will earn (1) a monthly tolling fee based on the volume of condensate processed, (2) miscellaneous terminalling service fees based on the volume of product handled and stored, and (3) a monthly tariff fee based on the volume of product transported through the pipelines.
Additionally, the customer may terminate the Agreements at will prior to the date the Assets are placed in service. If the customer exercises its early termination right, the customer will reimburse the partnership for capital expenditures incurred to construct the Assets and costs incurred in connection with the termination, and pay an accelerated tolling fee and accelerated tariff fee. In the event of early termination, the partnership will retain possession and ownership of the construction in process.
On these facts, the IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from the early termination payments will constitute qualifying income under I.R.C. § 7704(d)(1). The PLR discusses reimbursement of costs under Treas. Reg. § 1.7704-4(c)(10)(i), but includes no analysis to support treating the accelerated tolling and tariff fees as qualifying income.
2016
This PLR is quite similar to others dealing with oilfield services. The taxpayer is a PTP which is engaged in certain midstream operations. As a part of that business, the PTP provides fluid, solids, and oilfield waste handling, treatment, and disposal services to customers engaged in the exploration for, and development and production of, oil and natural gas. It supplies and transports drilling and fracturing fluids via trucks, tanks, and for some freshwater, pumps and pipelines. It also treats, recycles, and disposes of drilling and production wastes and provides truck and tank washout services, and recycling or disposal services related to the resulting fluids. It also earns income through the provision of frac tanks for temporary storage of water, flowback, produced water, pit water, drill cuttings, and other drilling and production wastes; and it provides hydrocarbon remediation services, removing hydrocarbons from the drilling waste at its facilities during the waste treatment and disposal process and sells such reclaimed hydrocarbons.
The PTP makes the common representations regarding its personnel’s specialized knowledge, training, and experience; the essential nature of its services to oil and gas drilling and fracking operations; that the processing and treatment of fluids is necessary to comply with government regulations and industry standards; and the continuous, daily involvement of its personnel throughout the cycle of each producing property.
The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from its fluid management, transportation, disposal, washout, and storage services is qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E), as is the income from its hydrocarbon remediation services performed as part of the disposal process so long as the PTP does not sell the recovered hydrocarbons to end users at the retail level. The ruling is not applicable to any income from the delivery and transportation of water, brine, or other injectants where the PTP does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the resulting produced water and drilling production waste after use.
The taxpayer is a PTP with two primary business segments: (i) pipelines and transportation; and (ii) wholesale marketing and terminalling. In order to finance asset acquisitions and conduct its business operations, the PTP periodically issues both fixed-rate and floating-rate debt securities. To manage its exposure to interest rate movements, the PTP enters into interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, forward locks, and treasury locks (together, the “Financial Transactions”). In some cases, the Financial Transactions entered into by the PTP are integrated with the related debt instruments under § 1.1275-6 of the Income Tax Regulations. The PTP requested a ruling only on Financial Transactions that are not integrated. The IRS ruled that the income Company from each of the four types of Financial Transactions is qualifying income within the meaning of section 7704(d)(1) of the Code and section 1.7704-3(a)(1) of the Regulations. The IRS cautioned that apart from that specific ruling, it did not express or imply any opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the Financial Transactions under any other provision of the Code.
PLR 201636025, issued May 26, 2016; released September 2, 2016. Regasification of LNG.
A PTP owns indirectly all of the outstanding equity interests in a limited partnership (LP) that is treated as a disregarded entity for tax purposes. LP owns and operates a liquefied natural gas receiving and regasification terminal. It has a processing agreement with two suppliers under which it receives LNG and processes it into gas for future transport. During this process the suppliers retain ownership of the LNG, while LP possession and control from its receipt until it is delivered to the suppliers’ delivery point. The suppliers pay a fixed monthly capacity fee for these services, for which they subscribe to a percentage of the terminal’s capacity. The IRS ruled that the income derived from the processing agreement is qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
This is another in the series of PLRs dealing with MLPs wishing to provide fluid handling services to oil and natural gas producers. In this case a partnership in formation will, after its IPO, supply drilling and fracturing fluids, including fresh water, brine, drilling mud, lubricants, and other injectants for use in drilling and hydraulic fracturing. The drilling mud will be recycled or produced from by-products of the partnership’s disposal services and the remaining products sourced from third parties. The fluids will be transported to the well site by third party trucks or pipeline. The partnership’s personnel will be at the well site on a regular basis to work with production teams to coordinate deliveries and will remotely monitor fluid levels to ensure a continuous supply of fluids. The partnership will also store, treat, and dispose of flowback produced water and other drilling production waste, generally using salt water disposal wells. Flowback and produced water will typically be transported to the wells by third party truck or pipelines; however, the partnership anticipates building its own pipelines.
In connection with its disposal services, the partnership will provide truck and tank washout services. It will also earn income from selling hydrocarbons and other minerals and natural resources that are collected as part of the disposal process. As in other similar cases, the taxpayer has made representations regarding specialized personnel, lack of utility for the equipment and personnel training outside oil and gas exploration, that the processing and treatment of flowback fluids and produced water is required by government regulations and industry standards, and that production of oil and gas via fracking would not be possible without these services.
The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from its fluid management and disposal services will be qualifying income under 7704(d)(1)(E), as will its income from sales of filtered hydrocarbons and other minerals collected as part of the disposal process as long as the sales are not to end users at the retail level. The ruling does not apply to any income from the delivery of water or other injectants, including recycled produced water, to affiliates or third parties where the partnership does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the resulting produced water and drilling production waste after use.
PLR 201619002, issued February 8, 2016; released May 6, 2016. Nitrogen-based fertilizers.
A corporation plans to form a publicly traded partnership (PTP). The partnership will be engaged in the production, storage, transportation, and marketing of nitrogen-based fertilizers: ammonia, ammonium nitrate, ammonium nitrate-ammonia (ANA), urea (both granulated and in solution), and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). The taxpayer represented that these products are all direct application fertilizers, and that they will be sold in bulk to customers operating in agricultural and non-agricultural industries. The IRS ruled that the income from the foregoing activities will be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E). This would be true, however, only to the extent that 1) the products in question are of a grade that is consistent with industry standards for agricultural uses as a fertilizer, 2) the product in the form sold is commonly sold and used as a fertilizer (for example, low density ammonium nitrate or ammonium nitrate solution would not qualify), and 3) the partnership does not make direct retail sales to end users.
The taxpayer is an MLP which provides pipeline gathering and transportation of crude oil, natural gas, and products thereof. Its transportation income includes income from construction, maintenance and operation of lateral pipelines and new points of connection to its pipeline system. The MLP also derives income from the transportation of “produced water” from crude oil and natural gas wells of its gathering system clients. It intends in the future to expand its water transportation services to include produced water transportation services to non-gathering clients, transportation of produced water that is not naturally occurring but is water flooded into a well to stimulate production, and transportation of produced water by truck rather than pipeline. It also intends to deliver fresh water, chemicals and other solutions to well sites for use in fracturing. The MLP will also collect, clean, recycle and otherwise dispose of the delivered water in accordance with federal, state or local regulations concerning waste products. Its employees will receive specialized training for the provision of these services and will provide services on an ongoing and frequent basis.
The MLP also derives income from parking agreements. in which its customers are charged a usage fee based on the quantities of natural gas stored (“parked”) at its facilities. Parking consists of (i) the receipt of gas for the customer’s accounts, (ii) the retention of the gas, and (iii) the subsequent removal of the gas for the customer’s account at the agreed upon time. These include cycling agreements, i.e., parking agreements with an upper limit on the amount of gas that can be parked in a given period. Finally, in connection with the debt obtained to finance its activities, the MLP enters into hedging agreements including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, and Treasury locks. It is specified that a ruling is sought only for those financial transactions that are not integrated with the related debt instruments.
The IRS ruled that the income from the following activities is qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E): 1) transportation of crude oil and natural gas pursuant to agreements described in the ruling; 2) natural gas parking activities including income from parking and cycling agreements to the extent parking income is separated from loaning income; 3) interconnect activities enabling the customer’s product to enter the MLP’s pipeline system; and 4) transportation of produced water; and delivery of fresh water and injectants where the MLP will also collect, clean, recycle and dispose of the water. It also found the income from the PTP’s hedging agreements to be qualifying income.
PLR 201611017, issued December 2, 2015; released March 11, 2016. Freshwater distribution, fluid handling and disposal, pressure pumping services.
An independent oil and gas company proposes to drop several midstream activities which it conducts through subsidiaries into an MLP. In addition to oil gathering and gas gathering and processing, these activities include the construction and operation of freshwater distribution pipeline systems and saltwater disposal systems. The MLP will provide fluid delivery, handling, treatment, processing, recycling and disposal services to oil and gas producers. It will also provide freshwater distribution to exploration and production operators through pipelines between freshwater delivery points and oil and gas producing wells and future drill sites. Pipelines may also deliver water into storage ponds operated by the MLP. The MLP will also transport by pipeline or tank truck, store, process, treat, and dispose of waste fluids. Finally, the MLP will provide pressure pumping services to oil and gas producers and may provide production support services for wells at which a third party is providing the pressure pumping services.
As with the other PLRs in this area, the taxpayer has made several representations aimed at meeting the requirements of the proposed qualifying income regulations, namely that: 1) the services provided by the MLP will require substantial assets and equipment that are dedicated exclusively to use in the exploration and production of oil and gas and have limited utility outside of those areas; 2) the services provided will require personnel with specialized knowledge, training, and experience; and 3) the production of oil and gas using fracking would not be commercially viable without fluid handling services; 5) for each well where the MLP provides freshwater sourcing and distribution as a qualifying activity, it will also provide produced water transportation and recycling or disposal activities; and 6) for each well where the MLP provides production support services where a third party is providing pressure pumping services, it will also provide produced water transportation and recycling or disposal activities.
The IRS ruled that the MLP’s income from freshwater sourcing and distribution services; produced water transportation, recycling, and disposal services; marketing of skim oil and other recoverable minerals other than to end users at the retail level; pressure pumping services; and production support services as described by the taxpayer constitute qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E). The ruling does not apply to any income from the delivery of water or other injectants, including recycled produced water, to affiliates or third parties where the MLP does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the resulting produced water after use.
PLR 201608011, released February 19, 2016. Fluid handling and disposal.
This is another in the series of recent PLRs dealing with provision of fluid handling and disposal services to oil and gas producers. The taxpayer is forming a prospective MLP which will provide fluids hauling, management, and disposal services for both fresh water and brine. In addition to the fluids management services, the MLP will design, construct, and operate a number of brine stations, where it will produce brine by pumping fresh water into salt caverns and either sell it onsite or transport it to an oil and gas producer’s site. It will also design, construct, and operate saltwater disposal wells and transfer flowback fluids and produced water from drilling operations to the wells by truck and pipeline for disposal. It will earn income from contracts with producers to transport fixed amounts of waste to its wells, from providing disposal services to other producers when it has excess well capacity, and from selling the filtered hydrocarbons collected as part of the disposal process.
The taxpayer has made several representations that conform with the intrinsic activities requirements of the proposed regulations under § 7704, including that it will provide personnel with specialized training, tools, and equipment who will oversee operations on a daily basis, that the training and equipment have no utility outside of oil and gas exploration, that production of oil and gas by hydraulic fracturing would not be viable without the services provided, and that processing and disposal of flowback fluids and produced water is required prior to injection in a disposal well to comply with governmental regulations and industry standards.
The IRS ruled that theMLP’s gross income from its fluid management and disposal services will be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E). Income from selling the filtered hydrocarbons collected as part of the disposal process will also be qualifying income as long as the sales are not to end users at the retail level. The IRS specified that the ruling will not apply to any income from the delivery of freshwater or chemicals where the MLP does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the delivered water or other chemicals after use.
This is another PLR dealing with oilfield services related to fracking. A prospective MLP (currently a non-traded partnership) plans to provide a full suite of fluid, solid, and oilfield waste handling, treatment, and disposal services to oil and natural gas producers engaged in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas. The services will include provision of fresh water, some of which will come from natural runoff and recycled water, and brine produced by injecting water into a salt cavern and retrieving the fully saturated brine that is returned through the cavern wellbore (and possibly recycled brine). It will also furnish drilling mud and casing cement. The water and other fluids would be transported by trucks, tanks, and pipelines owned and operated by the partnership. Pipelines will be used to transfer fluids between tanks at a well site and between sites at a property.
The partnership will also process, treat, dispose of, and recycle waste solids and waste fluids. It will earn income from marketing hydrocarbons recovered during the waste fluid treatment and disposal process. It intends to sell these reclaimed hydrocarbons in relevant markets other than to end users at the retail level. The partnership expects to earn income from washing out trucks, containment bins, tanks and other equipment used in the oil and natural gas extraction and production process. In addition, in conjunction with its recycling, disposal, and washout activities the partnership will earn income from recycling drilling mud.
For all these activities the partnership’s employees will be present to monitor and oversee, and in some cases to operate and maintain, the various processes. The taxpayer represents that 1) the services provided by the partnership will require substantial assets and equipment that are dedicated exclusively to use in the exploration and production of oil and gas and have limited utility outside of those areas; 2) the services provided will require personnel with specialized knowledge, training, and experience; and 3) the production of oil and gas using fracking would not be commercially viable without fluid handling services.
The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from the delivery of fluids, provision of inter-well water transfer services, and the processing, treatment and disposal of waste solids and waste fluids, including washout services, will be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E). The partnership’s income from the recovery, recycling, and marketing of brine, chemicals, and drilling mud to oil and gas producers and of hydrocarbons other than to end users at the retail level will also constitute qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E). The IRS specified that the ruling is not applicable to any income derived from the delivery of water, brine, drilling mud, or other materials to affiliates or third parties where the partnership does not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the delivered materials after use.
Interestingly, part of the rationale for the ruling was the fact that the process by which brine was produced is considered an extraction process and thus an allowable mining process.
2015
PLR 201549013, issued August 19, 2015; released November 27, 2015. Ground Leases of Real Property.
The taxpayer is an MLP which derives its income from leasing raw land and building rooftops. Under a typical arrangement, the owners of these sites enter into a ground lease with third-party tenants. The tenants will construct, own, and maintain cell towers, rooftop wireless and broadband internet installations, billboards, wind turbines, and solar arrays on the sites. During the term of the ground lease, the owner will sell all its rights and interests in the ground lease to the MLP, or to another party from whom the MLP later acquires them. The MLP represents that at least 85% of the income from each ground lease is from either land or a structure that is permanently affixed to the ground, not intended to be moved, and subject to damage if moved. The rents are generally fixed, but for billboards are calculated as a percentage of the tenant’s gross revenue or receipts from the billboard reduced by certain expenses. The MLP also represents that the rents will be paid for the right to use the sites and that tenants will not be related to the MLP, will operate the new construction, and will be responsible for maintaining the property on the site. The MLP will provide only those services that are customarily furnished in connection with the rental of the specific type of property in its geographic area. The IRS ruled that income earned from the ground leases qualified as “rents from real property” under section 856(d), as modified by section 7704(d)(3), and therefore, constituted qualifying income within the meaning of section 7704(d)(1)(C).
PLR 201549004, issued May 26, 2015; released November 27, 2015. Fracking Services.
A corporation engaged in exploration, development, an acquisition of natural gas, NGL, and oil properties formed an MLP and transferred some of its assets to it. The corporation also gave the MLP an option to purchase its E&P services business. The MLP wished to exercise the option. While several specifics are redacted, it is clear that the services business provides a full suite of services to the corporation in all phases of exploration and production, and that the services relate to fracking. The services include installing equipment and other infrastructure and providing personnel to monitor and adjust the equipment’s operation. The taxpayer provides the three representations necessary under the “intrinsic activities” test in the proposed regulations: 1) the services provided require substantial assets and equipment that are dedicated exclusively to use in the exploration and production of oil and gas; 2) the production of oil and gas by fracking would not be commercially viable without these services; and 3) all services from design to operation, as well as oversight of day to day operations, are provided by persons with a specialized knowledge base, training, and experience. The IRS ruled that the MLP’s income from the provision of these services would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
201548013-issued August 5, 2015; released November 7, 2015. Oilfield Services.
The taxpayer intended to form a publicly traded partnership which would provide a full suite of fluid handling, treatment, processing and disposal services throughout the exploration, development, and production process of oil and natural gas. These included provision and handling of water and other fluids; transportation of water between sites; hot oiler and superheater services; condensate vapor control and battery vapor services; processing, treating, and disposing of waste solids and waste fluids; washing out trucks, containment bins, tanks and other equipment used in the oil and natural gas extraction and production process; cleaning and decontamination services for drilling pipelines; slurry injection activities in order to refill well sites; and marketing of hydrocarbons recovered during the waste fluid treatment and disposal process (other than to end users at the retail level). The taxpayer made the representations necessary to meet the “intrinsic activity” test of the proposed regulations, including the use of specialized assets and equipment, the necessity of personnel with specialized knowledge and experience to perform the services, and the necessity of the fluid handling services for commercial viability of oil and natural gas production.
The IRS ruled that income from the taxpayer’s services as described below would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E):
- The delivery of fluids, provision of inter-well water transfer services, and the processing, treatment and disposal of waste solids and waste.
- The provision of hot oiler and superheater services, slurry injection activities, drilling pipe decontamination, washout services and condensate and battery vapor control services during the exploration and production of oil and natural gas.
- The recovery and marketing of hydrocarbons other than to end users at the retail level.
The IRS specified that the ruling was not applicable to any income derived from the delivery of water to affiliates or third parties where the PTP did not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the delivered water after use.
PLR 201545002, issued August 5, 2015; released November 6, 2015. Fluid Services.
A PTP intended to exercise its right of first offer to purchase its corporate sponsor’s water-related assets and associated fluid services business. The business pumps water from local rivers, streams, and other sources and transports it through pipelines, storage facilities, and pumping stations to oil and gas production sites for use in fracking operations. It also transports, stores, processes, treats, and disposes of waste fluids associated with fracking.
The taxpayer represented that (as required by the “intrinsic activities” language in § 1.7704-4(d) of the proposed regulations under section 7704): 1) the services provided require substantial assets and equipment that are dedicated exclusively to oil and gas exploration and production; 2) the services require personnel with specialized knowledge, training, and experience; and 3) the production of oil and gas by fracking would not be commercially viable without the fluids handling services.
The IRS ruled that the delivery of water and the collection, treatment, and transport of flowback, produced water, and other fluids would constitute qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E). It added, however, that the ruling is not applicable to any income derived by the PTP from the delivery of water, including recycled produced water, to affiliates or third parties where the PTP did not also collect and clean, recycle, or otherwise dispose of the delivered water after use.
PLR 201541008, issued June 29, 2015; released October 9, 2015. Fuel Sales.
Holds that a prospective PTP’s income from the transportation, storage, and marketing of fuel (additional details about this have been redacted) will be qualifying income. The prospective PTP primarily sells fuel to customers who are not end-users, including wholesalers and other fuel distributors and marketers. It also sells fuel to corporate and commercial users to negotiated contracts resulting from a competitive bidding process in quantities and prices that are not consistent with a retail sales transaction
The information in this PLR is heavily redacted, but the ruling is that income from a prospective PTP’s storage services to third party customers, pipeline transportation services, and marketing, including revenue from various sales and services agreements, will be qualifying income.
PLR 201537014, issued May 29, 2015; released September 11, 2015. Water Services.
A prospective PTP plans to earn income primarily by assessing fees for gathering, transporting, processing, treating and disposing of saltwater produced in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. Its assets will include ownership interests in saltwater disposal wells and associated assets including pipelines, rights of way, and equipment to operate the disposal wells. As a complement to the primary business, the PTP will remove skim oil from drilling waste during the disposal process and market it to relevant, non-end user markets. The prospective PTP represented that the personnel providing the services receive unique training, the saltwater disposal system does not have commercially viable uses, the processing and treatment are required by government regulations and industry standards, the personnel provide onsite services on a daily basis, and offsite monitoring services are performed on an ongoing basis for the exclusive use of the disposal system. Based on these facts and representations, the IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from providing the processing, treatment, and disposal services, as well as its income from marketing skim oil, would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
A prospective PTP owns an interest in entity Y, whose subsidiary entity A owns an LNG receiving and regasification terminal. Another subsidiary of Y’s, entity B, plans to construct and own liquefaction facilities at the terminal that will allow it to process and convert natural gas into LNG. A has a series of regasification agreements with company C under which it is committed to receive a specified amount of C’s LNG via tankers, store it in LNG tanks at the terminal, process the LNG into natural gas, and deliver the natural gas to C. A bears the risk of loss from the time the LNG is received at the terminal until the natural gas is delivered. Once B has constructed its liquefaction facilities, it plans to enter into a similar liquefaction agreement with C. It is expected that the liquefaction terminal would ultimately have several customers. The IRS ruled that income derived by the prospective PTP, directly or indirectly, from contracts for the processing, regasification, liquefaction, and storage of natural gas would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
The taxpayer requesting the ruling is a PTP which periodically issues both fixed-rate and floating-rate debt securities in order to finance asset acquisitions and conduct its business operations. The PTP uses standard interest rate swaps, forward start interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, and treasury locks to manage its exposure to the market reference rate on its debt, which affects the interest it must pay on the debt securities. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from each of the four types of financial transactions vs. qualifying income.
Under existing regulations (Reg. Section 1.7704-3(a)(1)), qualifying income includes income from notional principal contracts and other substantially similar income from ordinary and routine investments to the extent determined by the IRS. Income from a notional principal contract is included in qualifying income only if the property, income, or cash flow that measures the amounts to which the partnership is entitled under the contract would give rise to qualifying income if held or received directly by the partnership. In this case, the standard interest rate swap and interest rate cap are specifically included in the definition of notional principal contract and would generate qualifying income if held directly by the PTP.
The forward-start interest rate swaps and the treasury locks are specifically listed in the definition of a notional principal contract, but, the IRS decided they are both ordinary and routine transactions and, in this case, were entered into for the same purpose as a notional principal contract, that is to lock in an interest rate or manage the risk of interest rate movements on Company’s borrowing. Because they are substantially similar to notional principal contracts they may also constitute qualifying income.
2014
This PLR was issued to a limited partnership which planned to become publicly traded. The partnership owned oil and gas gathering systems and subsystems, a gas fractionation and processing plant, a truck terminal and a rail terminal, and rail tank cars specially designed to haul crude oil. It planned to use the assets to earn income under four agreements. These are described in detail in the PLR; but in quick summary:
- Agreement A: Gather and transport crude oil, including operation and maintenance of the gathering systems.
- Agreement B: Gather and transport untreated natural gas, , including operation and maintenance of the gathering systems.
- Agreement C: Provide gas processing services, deliver methane into interstate pipelines, and deliver NGLs to interstate pipelines and a rail terminal. Included are operation and maintenance of the processing plant, scheduling of gas deliveries, and storage of NGLs.
- Agreement D: Terminal and transport crude oil and NGLs for a per-barrel fee. Services included receiving crude oil from pipeline gathering systems, unloading trucks, storing crude oil in storage tanks, loading crude oil and NGLs onto railcars, storing propane in an underground storage cavern, and delivering crude oil through pipelines.
The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from the agreements as described in the PLR would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201448019, issued May 22, 2014; released November 28, 2014. Processing Iron Ore.
A publicly traded partnership requested a ruling regarding income from activities related to iron ore and products derived from the ore. The nature of the activities has been redacted, but the ruling refers to the beneficiation and pelletizing processes used to process lower grade iron ores, which were the subject of PLR 201351009. Processing iron oxide in this manner into direct reduced iron creates a suitable feedstock for steel manufacturing, with byproducts including carbon dioxide, water, and others which have been redacted The ruling mentions the possible purchase of feedstocks from third parties and sale of a product in bulk quantities (but not to end users at the retail level); again, details are redacted. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from its refining and processing activities and from the sale of direct reduced iron products as described would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201420012, issued August 30, 2013; released May 16, 2014. Oilfield Services.
The taxpayer requesting the ruling has formed a limited partnership which it plans to take public. The new PTP will engage in oilfield services activities. The specific services have been redacted, but the PLR mentions services necessary for the production of oil and gas and the need for experienced personnel at the site to ensure safe, efficient and effective exploration and production. It is stated that the PTP will derive income from providing supervisory, specialist and management functions at the well-site, and that it will provide certain technical services and tasks. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from providing the readacted services will be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E)–but in the case where the PTP does something which unfortunately has been reacted, the income will not be qualifying income.
PLR 201418921, issued October 25; released May 2, 2014. Coal Mining and Energy Infrastructure Services.
This ruling concerns a PTP whose activities focus on coal, oil, natural gas, and related energy infrastructure. The PTP manages and has an ownership interest in a joint venture which mines coal and producing premium metallurgical coal. The PTP oversees the day to day operations of the joint venture, and its services include engineering, mine planning, personnel management, asset procurement and maintenance, and financial management and controls, as well as any other services that may be needed. In return it receives a percentage of the gross sales price of coal mined, produced and sold, as well as monthly reimbursement of costs. No coal is marketed or sold at the retail level.
The PTP also provides energy infrastructure support services to oil and gas producers, including construction of drill pads, access roads, and fluid storage pads. It also provides the producers with heavy equipment and trained personnel in the event the producers or oilfield service companies require additional support services in mobilizing or demobilizing their drilling, completion or production activities. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income in the form of management fees, cost reimbursements and cost-sharing payments related to its management and operation of mining, production, processing, and sale of coal on behalf of the joint venture, as well as its income from the described energy infrastructure support services, would be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201417005, issued October 21, 2013; released April 25, 2014. Tanker Transport under Time Charters.
The taxpayer is a prospective PTP to which another company plans to distribute subsidiaries owning product tankers designed and certified to transport crude oil, petroleum products, and certain chemicals. The tankers will become the PTP’s initial fleet and carry refined products or crude oil. They will be operated under time charters with third parties under which the PTP will employ the master and crew of each tanker though contracts with a third party manager and be responsible for the navigation, operation, and maintenance of the vessel. The PTP will also be granted an option to buy several newly built vessels from a third company which has entered into time charters with major oil and gas companies for each vessel. Under the time charters the PTP wil be generally responsible for all aspects of the navigation, operation, and maintenance of the vessel, bears the risk of loss of the vessel, and is subject to various compensation reductions in the event of nonperformance. The charterer has the obligation to provide the master with instructions and sailing directions and is responsible for providing and paying for fuel, towage and pilotage, port charges and any expenses of loading and unloading cargo. The ruling describes in detail a number of other specifics of the charter arrangements, some of which are common to all the charters and some of which vary among them.
The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from transporting crude oil, refined petroleum products, and other products qualifying under § 7704(d)(1)(E) pursuant to the charters would be qualifying income within the meaning of § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201416003, issued December 27, 2013; released April 18, 2014. Fluid Handling Services.
An existing PTP was planning to generate income from 1) supplying fresh water via pumps and pipelines for use in the fracking process; 2) transporting fluids for use in oil and gas production; 3) transporting fluids to well sites; and 4) transporting flowback, produced water and other drilling and production wastes from producers’ well sites to disposal facilities owned by third parties. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from the fluid handling services described would be qualifying income under §7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201414004, issued September 11, 2013; released April 4, 2014. Frac Sand.
A PTP earns income from a variety of natural resource related business. One line of business generates income from the mining, processing, wholesale marketing, and transportation of frac sand to customers engaged in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. The majority of its income in this area comes from marketing the sand to oilfield services companies that resell it to oil and gas producers, but it occasionally markets the sand directly to producers. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from its frac sand operations is qualifying income under §7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201414002, issued December 16, 2013; released April 4, 2014. Frac Fluid Services.
The taxpayer is a limited partnership which plans to become publicly traded through an IPO. The partnership will earn income primarily from gathering and transporting oil and natural gas via gathering systems and pipelines; however, it also expects to earn income by providing essential fluid handling services to oil and gas producers. Specifically, it will supply fresh water for use in the fracking process, transport the fracking fluid to producers’ well sites for use in exploration and production activities, and transport drilling and production wastes from producers’ well sites to disposal facilities owned by third parties. The transportation will be provided by pipelines, trucks, and other equipment which the partnership is likely to own but may be owned by a third party. The IRS ruled that income earned from these fluid handling services would be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201412007, issued November 25, 2013; released March 21, 2014. Oil and Gas Related Services.
This PLR is heavily redacted, so provides only limited information. The taxpayer is a partnership which plans to be listed and publicly traded. A company which the partnership plans to acquire “a full suite of services,” specifics of which are redacted, to customers engaged in the production, processing, and transportation of oil and natural gas. Some aspect of these services “is an essential element in oil and gas production, processing, and transportation”. The IRS ruled that the partnership’s income from provision of these services would be qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201411004, issued November 8, 2013; released March 14, 2014. Sale of RINs; Fuel Delivery to Mining Sites.
The taxpayer is a partnership engaged, among other things, in the processing and marketing of gasoline and diesel fuel. It generates merchantable renewable fuel identification numbers (RINs) in the course of blending ethanol into gasoline and in producing renewable fuel from soy oil, animal fats, and waste cooking oil and blending it with traditional diesel products. From time to time it sells its excess RINs to a third party through a broker. The partnership also earns income by delivering refined fuels at mining sites to coal mining companies for use in their coal mining machinery and equipment, and states that this service is a critical and necessary part of developing coal mines and producing coal. The IRS ruled that both the partnership’s income from selling excess RINs and its income from the fuel delivery are qualifying income under § 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201410017, issued October 28, 2013; released March 7, 2014. Fluid Handling and Disposal.
This PLR is another ruling on oilfield services related to fracking. The taxpayer is a PTP which plans to provide fluid handling and disposal services to oil and gas producers. It will earn income from supplying water in the fracking process; disposing of flowback, produced water, pit water, drilling mud and other drilling and production wastes in accordance with environmental regulations; and hydrocarbon remediation services,–removing skim oil and similar hydrocarbons from drilling waste and selling them. It will provide transportation services for the water via trucks, tanks, and pipelines. As the business grows, it expects to source a portion of its water from third parties; for this water it will convert an existing gas gathering system that it owns into a water transportation system. It will also provide inter-well transportation services. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from these activities will be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201408025, issued November 13, 2013; released February 21, 2014. Mining and Processing an Unnamed Product.
This one of those PLRs that does not tell us much because important information has been redacted. The taxpayer plans to form a PTP which will mine an unnamed feedstock and process it into an unnamed product through a series of steps, the details of which have been redacted. The product will be sold to unspecified third parties; income will also be generated from storage and transportation of the product.The IRS held that income from the mining, processing, marketing, storage, and transportation of the product would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201408008, issued October 29, 2013; released February 21, 2014. Supplying Nitrogen and Oxygen to Refinery.
An existing PTP operates a system of petroleum product and crude pipelines, storage tanks, distribution terminals, and loading rack facilities. The PTP intends to acquire an air separation unit (ASU) which is a permanent piece of equipment built on the site of a crude oil refinery and integrated into the refinery facilities. The ASU’s entire existing capacity is dedicated to supplying nitrogen and oxygen to the refinery, and it will not be used for other purposes. The PTP plans to build or acquire ASUs at other refineries to serve the same purpose. The PTP has represented to the IRS that nitrogen and oxygen are essential elements in operating a refinery. The ASU to be acquired uses a cryogenic process to separate atmospheric air into oxygen and nitrogen, concentrate each to a high level of purity, remove them to separate towers, and direct them to plant supply headers. The IRS ruled that income from operating an onsite ASU used to supply nitrogen and oxygen to a crude oil refinery for use in the processing, refining, and transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products, and the provision of related services, would be qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201405011, issued September 25, 2013; released January 31, 2014. Oilfield Services.
This PLR provides limited information, as the services involved are not identified. The taxpayer requesting the ruling is a PTP providing redacted services to clients engaged in natural gas production and processing. The PTP’s affiliate is engaged in a redacted business and provides operations, maintenance, service, and a redacted operation for oil and natural gas production, processing, and transportation applications. The PTP intends to acquire a portion of its affiliate’s redacted business, including customer contracts and redacted items. The affiliate provides substantial services and is require to perform redacted services. The IRS ruled that income from the provision of redacted services to customers engaged in the production, processing, and transportation of oil and natural gas constitutes qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201403008, issued September 13, 2013; released January 17, 2014. Grease Blending and Packaging.
An existing PTP is engaged in the business of storage, transportation, processing, and distribution of petroleum products, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. The PTP blends refined petroleum distillates and lube oil base stocks with a “soap” or “thickener” to create lubricant-greases, which are semi-solid suspensions. The products are sold to wholesalers and other fuel distributors and marketers. The PTP also plans to engage in an operation , the details of which have been redacted, and will use the base oil in its blending and packaging activities and sell any surplus base oil and other refined petroleum products to wholesalers and retail distributors, but not to retail end-users. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from the grease blending and packaging operation and the redacted operation will constitute qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
PLR 201403004, issued September 6, 2013; released January 17, 2014. Additization and Blending Activities.
An existing PTP is engaged in the transportation, storage, and distribution of refined petroleum products owns a number of refined product terminals. The PTP charges fees at these terminals for receiving and loading fuels onto delivery vehicles for transportation. It also generates fees injecting fuel additives and blending ethanol and biodiesel into petroleum products during the loading process. The PTP acts solely as a wholesale distributor of refined petroleum products and does not engage in retail activity. The IRS ruled that the PTP’s income from its additization activities, ethanol blending, and biodiesel blending activities is qualifying income under section 7704(d)(1)(E).
For earlier PLRs, please contact Mary Lyman or click here for summaries.